Analysis Of Team Challenges and Strategies †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Analysis Of Team Challenges and Strategies. Answer: Prompt: In this modernized world with diverse organizations working towards gaining benefits globally, it becomes necessary to work as a team, united by a common goal. Thesis: Strategies and managerial implications are the key words in establishing a successful foundation with a good market position. A team comprises of different individuals with as expected diverse views due to cultural and behavioral diversities. Blueprint: This essay or analysis sets an insight on team challenges and strategies to manage the same in Ivey Executive MBA program (Iveycases.com 2017). Various collections of data determine the methodologies and the success plan towards the set goal. Three Key Issues Identified in the Case: Jake Santora, after duration of almost ten years, is all set to imply his self-experiences and categorized strategies to the EMBA program, a set up aiming for executive development. This person seemed to be elated and simultaneously worried about certain challenges that could prevail in the team, comprising of members, who are geographically diverse (Allen and Ofahengaue Vakalahi 2013). With the plan of four-day weekend per month, it is well deduced by Santora that it would be a challenge for the other 26 days to manage as team virtually, he having been a part of a cross-functional team in Asia. Formerly, by the term, virtual team comprising of geographically diverse members it is meant the collaboration of individuals separated by work, space and time while united by web interactions via technological support. Thinking of effectively managing the virtual team, the global trend of todays world, certain issues emerged out that needed management (Curry 2015). Firstly, the issue of compatibility surfaced, which indeed is a priority to have a unity in work-process. Here the concern was about the computing support available to the members of the virtual team. Applying segregation to the issue, it was about the Windows and Apple based computers, with a series of software applications operating. The witnessed challenge oriented with this issue was the utilization of diverse platforms to perform task, individually chosen and later an attempt in integrating the results. Secondly, the revision applied on the method the members should communicate. Two most appropriate approaches were c onsidered to solve the issue, namely the physical and virtual meetings in the synchronous section of communication. Third recorded issue was the asynchronous section of sharing documents. Attachments relative to professional front, from various individuals via E-mail was not found to be an commendable medium as this service restricts data transformation after a certain size of files transferred via web. To the rescue, large storage services were utilized, to which many people were not comfortable with or had a lack of experience in the same. Future Actions: Case exhibit 3 deals with the section of communication and information sharing through asynchronous meetings (Turk, France and Rumpe 2014). Two approaches were adapted namely, the face-to-face conduction and another tool of communication regarding this was virtual meet-ups, most likely, Skype, WebEx, GOTOMEETINGS and Anymeeting.com were some of the relevant platforms (Harindranath, Bernroider and Kamel 2015). Physical meetings seemed a challenge even if it is more effective. In this case, a combination of both the approaches was accepted. All the pre-mentioned platforms in relevance to exhibit 3 were used as the communication tools. While in Exhibit 4 insights the asynchronous data sharing mechanisms. The restriction on big-size files is a major challenge faced by individuals in a virtual team of computing, comprising of limitations such as duplications, errors and frustration (Robichaud et al. 2013). In relevance to the data collection, the tools such as DropBox, Google Drive, Microsoft Skydrive and Amazon Cloud Drive available on various platforms, some of them being windows, Mac Anroid, ios, Linux and likewise were used as the methodology in asynchronous data writing involving no constriction on the transferable data size (Labandeira, C.C., 2014). In context to the query of co-ordination of activities among the team members, exhibit 5 is taken into consideration to provide an analysis regarding the same. Real time projects comprise of tasks with short deadlines, which is possibly handled within one-two meetings while others were long-term with an approaching deadline of five months or more. Individuals in the team should have accessible tools to manage their milestones as well as the timelines, while simultaneously providing updates of work with the fellow members. Such an issue needs implications of software, which could provide updates relative to the real time situations, in order to avoid any errors (Schwalbe 2015). However, a possible technique could have been the Excel-sheet but then; it would isolate the updating responsibility on one person. Solutions to such situations would be Microsoft Project software, a management tool for project launching but with the requirement of often maintenance from the lead of the project . Alternate to this are the Baecamp, Ace project, Mavenlink and smart-sheet, which are some management tools for collaborative writing. Two Important Factors to Consider for Team-Based Activities: Other virtual tools could come to rescue, such as, real-time 3D collaboration, social networking and online chatting, which could provide support in updating and data transmissions (Thomson et al. 2015). Keeping in conscience, even a virtual team is comprised of real human beings with all possible exposure to errors and excellence. Two main important factors to build up an effective team would be compatible and trust-based relationships among the members each with the view of general profit and helpfulness they can provide to each other for building up a profound stature. In any given situation, a face-to-face collaboration proves to be more beneficial than a virtual one, as in the former method, each individual is more receptive and communicative towards the fellow partner (Turk, France and Rumpe 2014). Each subtle gesture could be noted and the responses could be well understood and managed. A system based on innovations could be possible as each individual could project his/her own belief and thoughts in an effective way. On analysis of the facts and data, it is well visible that to build a cohesive and effective team, trust and compatibility are the prior needs. In addition to this, for a virtual team as such in discussion, updating and innovating electronic platforms with more scopes that could be helpful in future development of organizations should be encouraged. Literacy and adjustments among members concerning such platforms is another essentiality, which could make things easier in handling and managing. Leadership should be adapted with care and excellence for promoting the general profit of a team.